http://tinyurl.com/jqrqlez

Check out the best advertising ever done here.

Wednesday, May 9, 2012

You’re Not Religious. You’re Just Intuitive.


Riddle me this: A bat and ball cost $1.10 in total. The bat costs $1.00 more than the ball. How much does the ball cost? If you answered $0.10, chances are you have strong religious convictions. On the other hand, if you came up with the correct answer of $0.05, you’re more analytical and probably more skeptical about religion too.
How do I know this? Because according to a study by neuroscientist and philosopher Joshua Greene at Harvard University (published last September in the Journal of Experimental Psychology) folks who answered questions like this one instinctively, were more likely to report stronger religious beliefs (and yes, researchers controlled for IQ, education, political leanings, and other factors). In a nutshell, psychologists divide thinking into two broad categories: intuitive thinking, which is fast and effortless (instantly knowing someone is sad from the look on his/her face, for example); and analytic thinking, which is slower and more deliberate (used for solving math problems and other tricky tasks).
Will Gervais, a graduate student at the University of British Columbia, reinforced this theory stating, "There's been an emerging consensus among researchers …that a lot of religious beliefs are grounded in intuitive processes." Gervais has conducted a bunch of experiments, all aimed at determining whether or not there’s a correlation between religious beliefs and one’s system of thought. Guess what? There is. And indeed, in every experiment, those who had to work harder to comprehend the question or deliver their answer also rated their religious beliefs lower. Coincidence? I think not.
The point is; it's tough to distinguish between what a person says they believe and what they actually do believe. But here’s what we know: When you're thinking more critically you reject statements that you might otherwise endorse. Ipso facto, many religious beliefs would be undermined if people were thinking more critically.
These findings probably won't change anyone's mind about whether God exists or whether religious belief is rational. In fact, if you're a religious person, you’ll likely view this evidence as God providing you with a system of belief that can only be truly appreciated at an intuitive level.
Just remember, there is only one correct answer to the “bat and ball” riddle above, and only one route to arrive at that answer. Cognitive.
For more on this topic, click here.